Wheeling, WV Wheeling News-Register story, 3/8/2010
http://www.news-register.net/page/content.detail/id/535302.html?nav=511
SILVER HILL – As Chesapeake Appalachia prepares to drill for Marcellus Shale natural gas in Oglebay Park, Wetzel County resident Raymond Renaud says those living near the proposed drilling sites may get far more than they bargained for.
Renaud, whose residence lies about a mile from a Chesapeake drilling well in the Silver Hill area, isn’t talking about money. He’s talking about the impact he and other members of the Wetzel County Action Group have seen on the surrounding area and residents’ way of life since Chesapeake began drilling there about three years ago.
“Our first concern is the traffic, by far,” said Renaud. “The situation has become quite dangerous.”
The winding roads leading to the drilling sites, he noted, are simply not designed for large trucks to travel safely.
“Our infrastructure does not support the activity. Our roads are such that a tractor-trailer simply cannot maintain his lane around our turns,” Renaud said.
He added that Chesapeake has been cooperative in taking steps to minimize the danger to residents, including putting escort vehicles in front of tractor-trailers and providing security vehicles to observe traffic conditions.
“Without those steps, we would have had countless fatalities,” said Renaud. Still, he estimated three to four accidents per day occur in the Silver Hill area involving gas drilling vehicles “going into a skid, sliding across the center line and off the road.”
Renaud said Brock Ridge and County Road 89, two major access roads for Silver Hill residents, “have taken a major beating” as they’re not designed to bear the load of so many large trucks. He said to Chesapeake’s credit, the company repaved both roads at its own expense – but the repairs haven’t held.
“They finished in the late fall, and Brock Ridge is completely destroyed,” said Renaud. “Their new paving job is gone. It’s a mud road.
“We’re talking about massive road failure. … We’re talking about some pretty massive effects. If your road totally disappears, that’s a pretty massive effect,” he continued. And during the winter, said Renaud, those roads are blocked by oversized vehicles multiple times each day.
“Locals who used to drive Brock Ridge now go out of their way and use other roads,” he said, noting he’s also a member of the Wetzel County Emergency Medical Service. “It’s normally a 14-minute trip, and I was an hour and a half getting to the Silver Hill Fire Department.”
Water pollution also is a concern, Renaud noted. He said in snowy weather, the company lays down “tremendous volumes” of cinders so its trucks can gain traction. When the snow melts, the cinders mix with the water, creating “a lava flow of cinders going into the creeks,” Renaud claims.
“The worst part about this, when it dries up, you’re inhaling tremendous volumes of cinder dust. The summer irritant for us is dust. … People have to power wash their homes,” he said.
Another worry stems from an industry process called hydraulic fracturing, or “fracing,” in which million of gallons of water, sand and chemicals are blasted into each well to break up the tightly compacted shale. Once the rock is fractured, some of the water – estimates range from 15 percent to 40 percent – comes back up the well. When it does, it can be five times saltier than seawater and laden with dissolved solids such as sulfates and chlorides, which conventional sewage and drinking water treatment plants are not equipped to remove.
Chesapeake officials have maintained they “aggressively implement best practices to reduce the possibility of leaks, spills and discharges” with regard to fracing.
Another industry practice, called flaring, occurs when drilling companies burn off surplus combustible vapors.
“They literally burn it out of the stack. Our concern is, we don’t know how toxic that gas is,” said Renaud. “If you live downwind or in a hollow, it’s a gagging odor. … It’s just not very pleasant.”
Renaud believes all these factors are adding up to plummeting property values for landowners near natural gas drilling sites.
“I moved here in the ’70s,” he said. “I moved to get away from the city, to live in a nice rural atmosphere, and now I live in an industrial zone. ”
If you live on a rural road and experience 40 trucks going by your house a day, you would have a hard time selling your house. … These people are now trying to get Chesapeake to buy their property because they can’t recover what they paid for the property. Mortgages outstanding are greater than the value of the property today,” Renaud claimed.
Renaud is calling on government officials to step in and help “exploit the Marcellus Shale in a way that benefits the citizens of Wetzel County and West Virginia.”
“I really don’t fault the gas development companies, because if they went out of their way to satisfy what we’re asking for, it’s going to increase their costs,” he said. “They wouldn’t be able to compete. It’s an industrywide thing. To me, this is a social issue that requires local, state and federal government.”
Please go to the story to see reader comments section
Tags: brine, Chesapeake, damage, flaring, local road, natural gas extraction, property values, roads, Wetzel County, WV
Illinois, if they paid you $6 THOUSAND an acre,
it would be far too little for the price you will pay.
But SIX DOLLARS an acre?
The gas industry has found another victim, it thinks.
Illinois farmers, show them they’re wrong.
P l e a s e.
http://www.courierpress.com/news/2010/mar/06/wanted-ill-farmland-with-natural-gas-reserves/
A Louisiana energy company has sent a team of workers to Edwards County, Ill., to lease hundreds of acres of farmland for a natural gas exploration project. The company is targeting a gas-bearing shale formation known as the New Albany Shale Group that lies about 5,000 feet beneath the surface.
“We first noticed the company doing research in the county assessor’s office about three weeks ago and decided to invite them to address our board,” said Rebecca Perry, director of the Edwards County Farm Bureau. “They actually wanted the board’s help getting these leases signed. But, it’s our position that we neither support nor oppose their plans.”
In an effort to understand Eagle Resources’ plans, the Farm Bureau asked the company’s chief executive, Earl Jenevein, to speak to landowners. In addition to Jenevein, a Farm Bureau attorney and a local lawyer with experience in oil and gas leasing were present to answer landowners’ questions.
During the first meeting, more than 70 landowners showed up.
Calls to Jenevein seeking his comments on the project were not returned.
Eagle has plans to drill down to the New Albany Shale Group, also known to local oil producers as the Devonian formation. After reaching the targeted shale formation, the company plans to drill four offset or horizontal wells to collect the natural gas.
Each horizontal well also would be 5,000 feet. Company officials say they must have 640 acres under lease for each of these collection wells.
Landowners who have been contacted by Eagle Resources have been offered $6 per acre for their land for each year of a five-year lease. In return for the lease, the landowner would also receive one-eighth royalty on any natural gas produced from the wells, which is considered a standard oil or gas royalty in the Tri-State oil basin.
“They’ve told us they first plan to drill three core sample wells around the first quarter of 2011,” Perry said. “The most promising of those test wells would then be drilled for production. If they’re successful, they tell us they plan to lease as much land as possible in Edwards County, and then expand outward from there.”
The area being targeted by Eagle Resources is in the southwestern part of Edwards County, near the Wayne County line. Specifically, the company is interested in land in Ellery and Dixon townships. Company officials said they chose the area because of its proximity to cross-country pipelines.
The natural gas potential of southeastern Illinois is well-known by researchers with the Illinois State Geological Survey.
Studies indicated that a 19-county section of southeastern Illinois is a favorable area to explore for gas in the Devonian shale formation. In a published study, Robert M. Cluff of the Illinois Geological Survey wrote, “Although gas shows in the shales have been encountered in several wells drilled in this area, no attempts were made to complete or evaluate a shale gas well until 1979.”
In 1979, core samples from two Wayne County wells were obtained, permitting the first quantitative assessment of gas content of the shales.
Cluff wrote that it will take unconventional drilling techniques to extract the natural gas.
“Commercial production of shale gas in Illinois probably will require novel drilling and completion techniques not commonly used by local operators,” Cluff wrote.
Local drilling contractors have been contacted by Eagle about their exploration plans.
Officials with the Farm Bureau are advising landowners to consult an attorney before signing any lease forms.
Bear in mind, $28 million divided among 8000 landowners equals an average payment to each landowner of just $3593.75. Pocket change for Chesapeake, and you know how settlements work…
http://www.wkyt.com/wymtnews/headlines/86535497.html
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) – A federal judge has approved a $28.75 million settlement between more than 8,000 eastern Kentucky landowners and a group of natural gas drilling companies in a dispute over royalty payments.
The class-action settlement released Thursday ends more than two years of litigation over royalties from drilling in Martin and Pike counties.
The landowners sued Chesapeake Appalachia LLC, NiSource Inc., and Columbia Energy Group over allegations of shortchanging royalty payments and providing inaccurate statements about royalty payments to the landowners.
The settlement covers royalty claims from Feb. 5, 1992, through April 23, 2009. U.S. District Judge Karen Caldwell said the settlement is fair to all parties because there was no guaranteed outcome for either side at trial.
“Given the unsettled nature of the law with respect to certain claims, a resolution of these issues by the Court would have constituted a significant risk for the class,” Caldwell wrote. “Undoubtedly, this relief is preferable to the possibility of a smaller recovery, or none at all, after an expensive and protracted trial and appeal are completed.”
. . . . .
Mike Banas, spokesman for Indiana-based NiSource, which merged with Columbia Energy, and Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake, said the company does not comment on lawsuits. Messages left for John Famularo, the attorney for the plaintiffs, were not immediately returned.
The lawsuit, filed in 2007 in federal court in Pikeville, stems from claims by 8,185 eastern Kentucky landowners who leased natural gas rights to Chesapeake, NiSource and Columbia Energy. The landowners claimed the companies did not pay them royalties in the manner required by the leases and sent royalty reports that didn’t show that Chesapeake was deducting losses and expenses from the royalties.
The plaintiffs also contended the three companies conspired to sell the natural gas produced from the wells at a below-market value price, even though the leases required the gas be sold at fair market value.
The companies denied wrongdoing during the litigation and the settlement doesn’t require them to acknowledge fault.
Complete story here
Click anywhere on image to be taken to:
Tags: eminent domain, Pennsylvania, Spectra Energy, Steckman Ridge compressor station
Just what every property owner wants: exhibitionist nitwit trespassers freely accessing their properties via the pipeline easements you seized by eminent domain.
The star of this little film describes it thusly:
“just me riding a honda recon on the millenium pipeline stayed in 2ed gear because i couldent realy shift , i was holding the camra”
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Stone Energy Corporation Proposed Surface Water Withdrawal and Natural Gas Well Site
View Draft Dockets D-2009-013-1and D-2009-018-1
Because of the high level of public interest in projects within the Delaware Basin that are associated with natural gas drilling activities, the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC or “Commission”) will hold a special public hearing on two projects sponsored by the Stone Energy Corporation (hereinafter, “Stone Energy”) to support natural gas exploration and development activities within the basin. One of the two projects entails a surface water withdrawal from the West Branch Lackawaxen River in Mount Pleasant Township, Pennsylvania (Docket No. D-2009-13-1). The other concerns an existing natural gas well drilling pad site in Clinton Township, Pennsylvania (Docket No. D-2009-18-1). Both projects are located in Wayne County, Pennsylvania, within the drainage area of a portion of the main stem Delaware River that the Commission has classified as Special Protection Waters.
The hearing will take place on Wednesday, February 24, 2010 from 3:00 p.m. until 7:00 p.m. Written comments will be accepted until 5:00 p.m. on March 12, 2010.
The hearing will take place at the Best Western Inn at Hunt’s Landing, 126 Routes 6 & 209, Matamoras, Pennsylvania 18336, beginning at 3:00 p.m. and ending at 7:00 p.m. Written comments may be submitted at the hearing and may also be sent as follows: via email to Paula.Schmitt@drbc.state.nj.us and otherwise to the attention of the Commission Secretary, DRBC, either by fax to (609) 883-9522; U.S. Mail to P.O. Box 7360, West Trenton, NJ 08628-0360; or delivery service to 25 State Police Drive, West Trenton, NJ 08628-0360. Regardless of the method of submission, comments should include the name, affiliation (if any) and address of the commenter and the subject line “Public Comment – Stone Energy Dockets.”
For further necessary information about this hearing and how to participate, please visit:
http://www.state.nj.us/drbc/notice_stoneenergycorp020910.htm
Tags: DRBC, hearing, water withdrawal
Leasing Our Lives Away
So you’ve signed a gas lease. Congratulations: You’ve been taken for a fool. Certain material facts were kept from you that, had you known them, likely would have made you throw the contract in the trash where it belongs. Since you didn’t, let’s take a virtual tour of your new reality.
If a lot of your neighbors also signed, the gas company now has powers you were never told about. The lessee can essentially do whatever he wishes on the surface to produce the gas under your property. He can hold your property hostage for decades by performing inexpensive, nonproductive tasks. He can, and from all historical evidence will, pollute any surface location where he installs mineral extraction equipment. He does not care what you think about it.

Perhaps more ominous is the fact that he is not limited to extraction of minerals from a specific formation (such as the Barnett Shale) but may explore for deeper deposits that are said to exist under the Barnett Shale. In South Texas his brethren are still holding leases executed in the 1930s, leases that have so polluted the surface as to make the land unusable for its earlier purpose of cattle ranching. With the original target minerals now played out, these lessees today are exploring for and producing gas there. Equipment that is no longer functional still leaks carcinogens into the ground. The surface rights owners have been denied access to areas on their property. So, while you’ve been told verbally that there’ll be no effects on your surface usage, that is not an enforceable contract provision, and the lessee, and his landman representative, knew it when he or she asked you to sign.
And probably no one told you that, to produce the gas, there will have to be a drilling pad with multiple wells on it and peripheral equipment that will require large-truck service daily throughout the life of the wells and that the company is allowed to build this pad less than 300 feet from homes. They didn’t tell you that each drilling pad will require a 16-inch gathering line to carry away the gas to a processing facility or that right-of-way for this line can be taken by eminent domain if necessary or that the line will lie as close as 20 feet from home foundations without regard to the possible presence of enclosed spaces under the homes that can cause accumulation of unodorized gas and subsequent explosions in the event of a leak.
They didn’t tell you that what’s in the gathering lines is the most corrosive form of natural gas, which in some cases has eaten through pipeline walls in less than four years, with catastrophic results. They didn’t say that their plan to install these pipelines by horizontal drilling through front yards at a depth of about 20 feet would not protect you from an explosion due to corrosion and leaks. In fact, burying the pipeline makes inspection possible only with instruments too expensive to be affordable by secondary operators who will be buying out the original drillers within five years of installation. And because these instruments do not detect all corrosion, incidents like the Appomattox pipeline explosion of 2008 that leveled two homes and damaged 100 more and created a fireball 1,125 feet in diameter but, mercifully, injured only five people.
Your lessee also didn’t tell you that between 2004 and 2007 there were nine “significant incidents” reported in the Barnett Shale, which by federal criteria means anything that causes fire, explosion, human injury or death, $50,000 or more in damage, or mass evacuation. Statistically, those numbers imply that when industry and the City of Fort Worth have enabled a full build-out of the gas field here, there should be roughly one such incident every six months in Fort Worth.
The city has acted as a co-conspirator by approving the industry’s activities and helping create a bandwagon atmosphere that blinds mineral rights owners with dollar signs. City officials continue to defend the drilling industry’s activities here and have entered into questionable leases of our parkland. They ignored a provision of the existing zoning ordinance that would limit such installations to heavy-industry zones and have passed a new zoning ordinance that permits gas drilling and gas gathering processing and pipelines in every zoning category. They have knowingly denied the dangers both of the pollution and the “significant incidents” that are sure to come.
Elected officials have also ignored public safety and public health concerns, the backbone of the state zoning code, in favor of asserting the primacy of mineral rights over all other rights. Their 600-foot setback provision, touted as a safety measure, is not based on any scientific or engineering data. Last month the council showed the ultimate contempt for that phony provision by permitting Chesapeake Energy to create a multi-well drilling pad within 600 feet of 48 “protected use” properties – even though Chesapeake was able to secure waivers from owners of only nine of those properties.
You can see where this is all leading.
When Fort Worth has its next significant gas well or pipeline accident, there will be hand-wringing at city hall and attempts to manage the public reaction. “Whoops! This is just an act of God, an unfortunate rare occurrence that nobody could have foreseen!”
Next, the fire marshal will be asked why he didn’t tell the council about the dangers of placing these pipelines so close to houses with pier-and-beam foundations. The New London School explosion of 1937 will be mentioned.
After that will come the insurance industry, with eyes bugged out. “This was forecast. Now it has happened, and the math says it is likely to happen here with a regularity that we cannot afford. Therefore, Fort Worth homeowners will have to buy an extra rider on their mortgage insurance, and the cost will be …” you don’t want to know. Many people will no longer be able to afford to live in their homes.
Next, the value of homes will fall, since national publicity of our woes will make homes tough to sell. That will cause taxing authorities to raise tax rates. After that, Wall Street will also get the bug-eye and degrade bonds in Tarrant County.
This is what almost certainly will happen here if the gas drillers have their way.
And what will you get? Maybe the lease offer on your quarter-acre lot included a bonus of $25,000 per acre plus 25 percent royalties. If gas prices stay high that might get you about $208 per year in royalties, or about $12,450 total (including your bonus) over a 30-year payout lifetime.
Oh, and remember, that’s the gross amount. It doesn’t consider income tax and an ad valorem property tax increase due to all that gas you own. Of course, gas prices are in the toilet right now, and they’re selling less gas than they’d expected.
Do you still think the Barnett Shale is a personal bonanza? Do you think your mineral lease omits enough material facts to render it fraudulent? In that case, your lease is probably fraudulent
and unenforceable.
Good luck with that.
Jerry Lobdill is a retired physicist, a longtime environmental activist, a writer, and the owner of a home with mineral rights in Fort Worth. What he’s not is a lawyer, and nothing in this article should be construed as legal advice.
- reprinted in full from Fort Worth Weekly with author’s permission
http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/153902/
Published December 05 2009
Superior man accused of trespassing on own land also faces disorderly conduct charge
By: News Tribune, Duluth News Tribune
Jeremy Engelking, 27, of Superior was expecting to be charged Friday with trespassing on a construction site in connection with a dispute over a pipeline being installed across his property. But he was surprised to learn he also would face a disorderly conduct charge.
Engelking was arrested Wednesday after he confronted a crew on his property installing the line for Enbridge Energy Partners. He contended that the workers had no right to be on his property, as he had received no easement payment from Enbridge.
Denise Hamsher, an Enbridge spokeswoman, said the Engelking family repeatedly has been offered payment to install new pipes in the existing easement but has refused the money. She said Enbridge has offered the Engelkings a financial settlement far in excess of what’s called for in the original right-of-way agreement.
The Engelkings have rejected the payments for fear they would result in diminished property rights.
The Engelkings attempted to block the pipeline’s installation in September by taking the matter to court, but Judge George Glonek upheld Enbridge’s right to install a new line.
When arrested, Engelking was cited by officers for trespassing on the work site.
“I was shocked they added the disorderly conduct charge,” he said following Friday’s hearing. Engelking said he never resisted arrest. A rifle was strapped to the front of his ATV, but it was never removed from its case and Engelking said he never threatened anyone with it. Engelking said he was headed out to go deer hunting when he saw the pipeline crew at work on his property.
Engelking is scheduled to return to Douglas County Court on Dec. 16 for a pretrial conference.


0