From The Sun Gazette, 3/17:
Spill from drill site likely contains 2-butoxyethanol
WATERVILLE – A substance used in the natural gas drilling process is discoloring and distorting the texture of spring water running off a Cummings Township sidehill.
. . . . .
The mysterious substance was seen flowing down the slope, under the road and into Pine Creek, said Daniel T. Spadoni, spokesman for DEP’s northcentral region office. Officials from another state agency alerted DEP.
“We were notified (Monday) morning by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources,” Spadoni said. “There was a white foamy material discharging from a spring down the hill.”
. . . . .
Terming it a surfactant, Spadoni said a substance known as Airfoam HD was causing the water run-off to be unnatural in appearance.
. . . . .
Surfactant used to treat Pennsylvania General Energy wells affected the water run-off, which Spadoni said had nothing to do with hydrofracturing.
Workers for the Warren-based energy company are drilling five wells in the area, high above the road, but he said they have yet to reach the point of using highly pressurized water to break the rock underneath the ground.
They were using the whitening substance as a lubricant that lowers the surface tension between air and water, according to Spadoni.
A receptionist answering a Pennsylvania General Energy phone Tuesday afternoon said company officials were not available to comment.
“They’re attempting to determine what caused this problem and what actions they can take to stop it,” Spadoni said of energy company representatives, with whom DEP members have been communicating.
The only precaution Spadoni recommended to residents is to avoid the suspicious spring water run-off in the area.
“I don’t think you would want to drink this discharge,” he said.
The substance leaking down the hill isn’t listed as dangerous on a Material Safety Data Sheet, according to Spadoni.
“I don’t believe there are concerns about drinking water in Waterville at this time,” Spadoni said, adding that area residents can continue regularly using tap water in their homes.
The investigation will continue.
“We don’t know for sure what its chemical composition is,” Spadoni said.
-end of excerpt of Sun Gazette article-
.
Now, you have to wonder what Material Safety Data Sheet Spadoni is talking about. The one copied below says the component of Airfoam HD is 2-butoxyethanol, also known as 2BE, which is linked to a particular kind of adrenal tumor that’s rare… unless you happen to be Laura Amos, who was exposed to 2BE, got that adrenal tumor, and wrote the following (click above on her name for complete text):
In August 2004 I came across a memo written to the US Forest Service and BLM Regional offices in Delta County, describing the health hazard posed by a chemical used in fluids that are injected underground to enhance the release of methane. Dr. Theo Colborn of Paonia, Colorado submitted the memo in response to decisions that were being made in Delta County by the government officials to allow gas exploration and development on the Grand Mesa. Colborn is the President of the Endocrine Disruption Exchange, Inc (TEDX) and for over 10 years directed the World Wildlife Fund’s Wildlife and Contaminants Program. She has been honored worldwide for her focus on the effects of synthetic chemicals on human and wildlife health. The focus of Colborn’s memo was on a chemical called 2BE, used in fracturing fluids.
The following information was taken from Colborn’s report: “2BE is a highly soluble, colorless liquid with a very faint, ether like odor.” She wrote that at the concentration to be used in Delta county 2BE might not be detectable through odor or taste. “2-BE has a low volatility, vaporizes slowly when mixed with water and remains well dissolved throughout the water column.” “It mobilizes in soil and can easily leach into groundwater.” “It could remain entrapped underground for years.”
She noted it is readily absorbed by the skin and can easily be inhaled as it off-gasses in the home. Colborn cited the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Profile that listed the following effects of 2-BE: kidney damage, kidney failure, toxicity to the spleen, the bones in the spinal column and bone marrow, liver cancer, anemia, female fertility reduction, embryo mortality, and the biggie that got my attention – elevated numbers of combined malignant and non-malignant tumors of the adrenal gland.
-end of excerpt-
Here’s the MSDS that Spadoni mentions, but, hmmm, maybe just hadn’t read?
"Component: 2-butoxyethanol"
A deep bow and sweeping tip of the hat to Nastassja Noel for the Material Safety Data Sheet.
For more on this story, and more photos, see
Citizens Alarmed By Foam Discharge
Tags: 2-butoxyethanol, 2BE, contamination, DEP, Laura Amos, MSDS, spill
From the Star-Telegram, January 14, 2010:
In D-FW, ’sobering’ asthma numbers
Look at a third-grade class or a youth soccer game, and start counting.
“One, two, three, asthma; one, two, three, asthma,” said Larry Tubb, senior vice president for system planning at Cook Children’s Health Care System. “That’s sobering.”
It represents a growing health problem in North Texas, where 1 in 4 children ages 8 and 9 has the lung disease. The state average for 5- to 9-year-olds is 7.1 percent; the national average for all children is 9.4 percent.
-end of article excerpt-
Now, why would the Dallas-Fort Worth area have a childhood asthma incidence that’s more than 2.5 times the national average?
.
Now, if natural gas is such a “clean” fuel, why d’ya suppose they’d do that?
From the newsletter of the American Petroleum Institute:
API backs resolution to block EPA from regulating carbon emissions
The American Petroleum Institute was among the oil and natural gas groups that signed a letter expressing support of Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s, R-Alaska, resolution against the Environmental Protection Agency’s plan to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions. Energy prices could increase and many jobs would be affected under the agency’s proposal, according to the letter. Oil & Gas Journal (3/11)Natural gas suppliers oppose EPA’s GHG regulations: The Natural Gas Supply Association announced its support of a resolution sponsored by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, that would stop the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse-gas emissions. The agency’s proposed rule would “burden many natural gas projects with a time-consuming permitting process that would interfere with bringing more natural gas to market,” said trade group CEO Skip Horvath. The Wall Street Journal/Dow Jones Newswires (3/11)
For more on Senator Lisa Murkowski, see A Lobbyist Finds His Senator
*Substitute your state environmental regulating agency
Guest post by Lynn Senick:
.
On Feb. 2, DEP fined Talisman Energy $3,500 for violations at its “Cease” well pad in Troy Township discovered during inspections in 2009. A February 2009 inspection revealed that the company had not publicly posted the permit number and other required information at the entrance of the well pad. During a follow-up inspection in June 2009, a DEP statement explains, “flow-back fluids — or the fluids that are used to break up underground rock and then return to the surface — were found discharging into a drainage ditch, an adjacent sediment basin, and eventually through a vegetated area into an unnamed tributary of the south branch of Sugar Creek.” The Daily Review
“A vertical drilled well in The Marcellus Shale zone costs $810,000 to drill while a horizontal drilled well will cost you roughly 3-5 million dollars.” oilshalegas.com In the Marcellus shale, Talisman drilled nine gross (nine net) wells during the quarter, for a total of 12 gross (12 net) in the first half of the year. The development plan is ahead of schedule and the company is now producing at rates in excess of 30 million cubic feet of gas per day. ugcenter.com .
COST OF DRILLING ONE HORIZONTAL WELL; $ 4 MILLION
A FINE OF $3500 is 0.0875% – the value of a a used Chevy Caravan.
VALUE OF CLEAN AIR, LAND, & WATER?
PRICELESS
.
Tags: DEP, fine, spill, Talisman, violations

photo credit The Daily Star
Excerpt from The Daily Gazette, Schenectady, NY on the pipeline explosion in North Blenheim, NY, twenty years ago on March 13, 1990:
Effects of deadly blast still felt
EDWARD MUNGER JR
Earth scarred by the massive explosion that rocked this rural Schoharie County town 20 years ago has since healed and buildings reduced to smoldering rubble have long since vanished.
But people who recall the sudden death of two neighbors and the devastation caused when a pipeline burst say they don’t expect to ever forget the fateful morning of March 13, 1990.
The pipe carrying liquid propane, running north of state Route 30 near West Kill Road in North Blenheim, ruptured and sent a cloud of flammable gas drifting downhill.
The cloud exploded about 7:30 a.m. when it got to the intersection of Route 30 and West Kill Road, killing Blenheim resident and firefighter Robert Hitchcock, 53, and Central Bridge resident Richard Smith, 43. The explosion destroyed 14 homes and injured five people.
New gear added to the pipeline’s infrastructure and town buildings built after the blast — dedicated in honor of Hitchcock – stand as reminders of the devastation today.
And in the 20 years since, more stringent regulations governing pipelines and an added emphasis on safety have accompanied a 10 percent reduction in serious accidents, a government spokesman said.
North Blenheim resident Peter Giesin recalls being in the cellar of his West Kill Road farmhouse when his daughter called to him asking what was going on in the field outside their home.
“I looked out, there’s this white plume. At the time, I thought it was smoke. I thought an airliner had crashed or something,” Giesin said.
The white cloud was a plume of gasified propane that leaked out of the Texas Eastern Products Co.’s underground pipeline — a pipeline run underground in the 1960s despite resident opposition that was ultimately overpowered by eminent domain.
“I realized it was the pipeline blowing this plume of gas across the field which, naturally, was going downhill away from us. Then, within less than five minutes, a ball of fire came back over the hill from downtown where it ignited,” Giesin said.
“The village looked like a war scene. It was just destroyed,” said Blenheim resident Gail Shaffer, who was working as secretary of state in Albany and rushed to the scene.
“When we got to the village, it was all charred remains of buildings. There were 12 or 15 different fire companies with their hoses still on. It was organized chaos at that point,” Shaffer said. “I will never forget.”
photo credit The Daily Gazette
Today, offshore and onshore gas transmission lines carrying hazardous liquid such as propane stretch for more than 2.5 million miles in all 50 states, according to the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, or PHMSA.
New York state accounts for a total of 53,275 miles of underground pipelines.
PIPELINE MAINTENANCE
Following the 1990 disaster in North Blenheim, engineers hired by the government determined that several months before the accident, workers from the pipeline company raised the pipe to insert a rubber washer between it and a casing pipe around it. The work was in response to a short circuit detected in the system that uses a small electrical charge to keep the pipe from corroding.
Engineers at the time said the crew filled the pipeline hole back in but the dirt might have been frozen. Once thawed, it allowed the pipe to settle and a weak point in the pipe — a manufacturing defect — broke in half.
A National Transportation Safety Board investigation that followed criticized the fact that the pipeline’s operators were unable to detect a drop in pressure when the pipe leaked; the nearest monitoring location was in Gilbertsville, Otsego County, about 15 miles west of Oneonta and roughly 68 miles from North Blenheim. Afterward, the pipeline company installed remote terminal units to monitor the pressure at pump stations and receiving stations.
The same 4,200-mile-long pipeline, which stretches from Texas to Selkirk, Albany County, sprang a leak in January of 2004. An explosion that followed destroyed one home in Delaware County but no injuries were suffered.
Engineers determined the 2004 pipeline leak was caused by frost heave separating a valve from the pipe. Roughly 5,000 gallons of propane in the pipe burned for three days after the blast.
In the 20 years since the blast in North Blenheim, the federal Department of Transportation has created the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, expanding the department’s inspection and enforcement abilities and doubling the number of inspectors and accident investigators, said Damon Hill, a spokesman for the federal DOT.
“Since then, we’ve had a number of regulations introduced that includes regulations for [pipe] integrity management programs, operator qualifications, control room management and quite a few other things to help make pipelines a lot safer,” Hill said.
Among the new standards is a requirement that pipelines be capable of undergoing an internal inspection, he said.
The “call before you dig” number was developed after the Schoharie County explosion, Hill said, to help stem third-party damage to pipelines he said are responsible for the bulk of pipeline failures today.
The pipeline changed hands in terms of ownership, with TEPPCO merging with Enterprise Products Partners LP in October of 2009, Enterprise spokesman Rick Rainey said.
Complete story available for fee from The Daily Gazette
Tags: eminent domain, pipelines
.
Guest post by Maura Stephens, originally published at Reader Supported News
“Update: PEMA urges residents to prepare now for possible flooding.”
“DEP directs gas drillers to replace water.”
“Man killed by fall off Towanda drilling rig.”
I read these three stories in that order. The first two were in the Pike County [Pennsylvania] Courier, the third in the Binghamton [New York] Press & Sun Bulletin. The headlines of the first (get ready for a flood) and third (a man died in a gas-drilling accident) are self-explanatory. The second, about “replacing” water, went like this:
“The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) . . . ordered Schreiner Oil and Gas Co. to provide a permanent solution to water supply issues at two homes the company’s drilling activity impacted near Hedgehog Lane, McKean County.
“DEP previously determined that the company, based in Massillon, Ohio, was liable for affecting the water supplies of homes. . . . among the contaminants identified were total dissolved solids, chlorides, manganese, iron, dissolved methane and ethane gas.”
Does this not terrify everyone who lives in the huge gas-drilling and potential gas-drilling region? (The Marcellus Shale encompasses large swaths of New York State, almost all of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, and parts of Maryland, Virginia, Tennessee, and Kentucky. A total of 31 or 32 states have deposits of so-called “natural” gas, more properly termed “fossil-fuel gas.”)
Here are some facts:
1) The horizontal, slick-water hydraulic fracturing process of gas drilling (“chemo-fracking”) uses and releases numerous toxic chemicals — carcinogens, endocrine disruptors, naturally occurring radioactive materials.
2) Accidents happen.
3) People make mistakes.
4) Floods occur.Anyone who has ever experienced a flash flood knows that you’re going to run for your life and your loved ones’ lives first, and for your most expensive and/or most precious possessions next.
Even if gas companies had our best interests at heart — and you’d have to be a total naïf to think they do — there is simply no way to protect us from all these toxins that would go streaming into our water systems in the event of a flood, let alone the inevitable accidents and mistakes that will occur.
Because they will.
In the cases where the gas companies have to “replace” water, what are we talking about?
You can’t “replace” water that has been contaminated with poisons. You can bring in huge “water buffaloes” with 300 or 500 gallons of “fresh” water from elsewhere (and who is monitoring that water? Where does it come from?) to resupply a family with drinking, cooking, and bathing water, but the ground is still contaminated.
The vegetables and flowers and shrubs in the family’s garden are still reliant on that water for survival. The squirrels, bunnies, and raccoons . . . the chickadees, warblers, and woodpeckers . . . the frogs, fish, and turtles . . . the crickets, bees, and peepers . . . the family cat and dog . . . all drink the water from that contaminated ground. Toddlers in sandboxes eat the dirt. Kiddie pools and grown-ups’ pools, bird baths, ponds, streams, rivers, and lakes . . . all can be contaminated from just one spill.
You can’t “replace” bad water with good. Period.
There is not enough recompense in the world to mitigate this kind of permanent damage to a person’s home and property or to our surrounds, or to our own health and our children’s health.
It is up to communities to decide if the risks are worth the riches that will go to the gas companies and to a few members of the communities.
Let’s think about these risks for a moment: Someone in my community will die because of fracking. It’s inevitable. The man who was killed on a gas rig in Towanda, Pennsylvania, has a name: Greg Allen Henry. He was from Athens, Tennessee. He was 31 years old and was killed when he fell from a rig and suffered massive head trauma.
Are the risks worth the reward? How many lives are worth how many dollars? The job (of the many promised to Pennsylvanians and New Yorkers) came, no doubt, with pretty good pay to bring a Tennesseean so far from home. But was it enough for Greg Henry’s family? Will it help ease their grief?
Will you be getting free energy for life, if you lease your land and it’s fracked? Will you ever feel safe drinking the water? Will the royalty fees cover the loss of your home’s value? Where will you go if you are forced to leave your valueless home? What will happen to the investments of time, equity, sweat, and tears—let alone cash—you’ve poured into it? How much money is enough?
Is a Tennessee man’s life worth as much as a Towanda child’s life? If your child drinks contaminated water today and develops cancer in five years, will a gas company come forward to help you pay for your child’s chemotherapy and radiation treatments, and hold your hand while you wait for the latest medical test results that will tell you if she will live or die?
Are the risks worth the reward?
Whose risks? Whose reward?
Are the risks worth the reward?
Every community must come up with its answer.
See also Is the juice worth the squeeze?
Tags: Community Effects, deaths, water contamination, water wells, workers
Why is this man inside this pipe?
It’s because he wants us to know the size of the natural gas pipeline Chesapeake wants to put under his front yard, feet from his house on Carter Avenue in Fort Worth, Texas.
It’s because he doesn’t
want his kids to have to
play a few feet above
Chesapeake’s pipeline.For being a concerned
father & good neighbor,
what has he gotten?Dragged into court against
Chesapeake, that’s what.And if that wasn’t enough,
hassled by the city of
Fort Worth.He can’t afford an
attorney, so he’s had to
take on the suit
(and the suits)
by himself.He’s doing a great job, but he needs our help.
The judge presiding over his case could sign the order any day that would grant Chesapeake the “right” to proceed with its plans to endanger this family and all their neighbors.
So it’s time to e-mail or snail mail the judge to let him know that we know that even though something may be legal (like a giant rich corporation using eminent domain to stick a hazardous pipeline through a modest residential neighborhood where people aren’t really in any position to defend themselves), that doesn’t make it moral, or just.
Read more here: Jammin’ Mole writes about Carter Avenue
and here: Durango Texas writes about Steve Doeung
and finally (or better yet, first) here: Please send e-mail to judge
These kids should not have to play over a pipeline
that’s a disaster waiting to happen

On a cold morning in March, Steve & family on the courthouse steps, seeking justice
Tags: Carter Avenue, Chesapeake, eminent domain, Steve Doeung
.
http://1490newsblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/spill-now-believed-to-be-accidental.html reports:
“Although emergency crews first thought the oil spill on Hedgehog Lane this morning was malicious, police now believe a valve was accidentally opened, according to Bradford Township Supervisor Gayle Bauer. She said the investigation is continuing.
. . . . .“The operation is run by Aiello Brothers.
“Bauer said three vacuum trucks are still on the scene working on containment, and that another environmental cleanup company is coming in to help.
“Just over two weeks ago Schreiner was ordered by DEP to provide a permanent solution to water supply issues at two homes the company’s drilling activity impacted near Hedgehog Lane.
“DEP had previously determined that Schreiner was responsible for affecting water supplies at other homes in the area.”
Tags: Aiello Brothers, Bradford Township, McKean County, oil spill, Pennsylvania, Schreiner
Illinois, if they paid you $6 THOUSAND an acre,
it would be far too little for the price you will pay.
But SIX DOLLARS an acre?
The gas industry has found another victim, it thinks.
Illinois farmers, show them they’re wrong.
P l e a s e.
http://www.courierpress.com/news/2010/mar/06/wanted-ill-farmland-with-natural-gas-reserves/
A Louisiana energy company has sent a team of workers to Edwards County, Ill., to lease hundreds of acres of farmland for a natural gas exploration project. The company is targeting a gas-bearing shale formation known as the New Albany Shale Group that lies about 5,000 feet beneath the surface.
“We first noticed the company doing research in the county assessor’s office about three weeks ago and decided to invite them to address our board,” said Rebecca Perry, director of the Edwards County Farm Bureau. “They actually wanted the board’s help getting these leases signed. But, it’s our position that we neither support nor oppose their plans.”
In an effort to understand Eagle Resources’ plans, the Farm Bureau asked the company’s chief executive, Earl Jenevein, to speak to landowners. In addition to Jenevein, a Farm Bureau attorney and a local lawyer with experience in oil and gas leasing were present to answer landowners’ questions.
During the first meeting, more than 70 landowners showed up.
Calls to Jenevein seeking his comments on the project were not returned.
Eagle has plans to drill down to the New Albany Shale Group, also known to local oil producers as the Devonian formation. After reaching the targeted shale formation, the company plans to drill four offset or horizontal wells to collect the natural gas.
Each horizontal well also would be 5,000 feet. Company officials say they must have 640 acres under lease for each of these collection wells.
Landowners who have been contacted by Eagle Resources have been offered $6 per acre for their land for each year of a five-year lease. In return for the lease, the landowner would also receive one-eighth royalty on any natural gas produced from the wells, which is considered a standard oil or gas royalty in the Tri-State oil basin.
“They’ve told us they first plan to drill three core sample wells around the first quarter of 2011,” Perry said. “The most promising of those test wells would then be drilled for production. If they’re successful, they tell us they plan to lease as much land as possible in Edwards County, and then expand outward from there.”
The area being targeted by Eagle Resources is in the southwestern part of Edwards County, near the Wayne County line. Specifically, the company is interested in land in Ellery and Dixon townships. Company officials said they chose the area because of its proximity to cross-country pipelines.
The natural gas potential of southeastern Illinois is well-known by researchers with the Illinois State Geological Survey.
Studies indicated that a 19-county section of southeastern Illinois is a favorable area to explore for gas in the Devonian shale formation. In a published study, Robert M. Cluff of the Illinois Geological Survey wrote, “Although gas shows in the shales have been encountered in several wells drilled in this area, no attempts were made to complete or evaluate a shale gas well until 1979.”
In 1979, core samples from two Wayne County wells were obtained, permitting the first quantitative assessment of gas content of the shales.
Cluff wrote that it will take unconventional drilling techniques to extract the natural gas.
“Commercial production of shale gas in Illinois probably will require novel drilling and completion techniques not commonly used by local operators,” Cluff wrote.
Local drilling contractors have been contacted by Eagle about their exploration plans.
Officials with the Farm Bureau are advising landowners to consult an attorney before signing any lease forms.
Bear in mind, $28 million divided among 8000 landowners equals an average payment to each landowner of just $3593.75. Pocket change for Chesapeake, and you know how settlements work…
http://www.wkyt.com/wymtnews/headlines/86535497.html
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) – A federal judge has approved a $28.75 million settlement between more than 8,000 eastern Kentucky landowners and a group of natural gas drilling companies in a dispute over royalty payments.
The class-action settlement released Thursday ends more than two years of litigation over royalties from drilling in Martin and Pike counties.
The landowners sued Chesapeake Appalachia LLC, NiSource Inc., and Columbia Energy Group over allegations of shortchanging royalty payments and providing inaccurate statements about royalty payments to the landowners.
The settlement covers royalty claims from Feb. 5, 1992, through April 23, 2009. U.S. District Judge Karen Caldwell said the settlement is fair to all parties because there was no guaranteed outcome for either side at trial.
“Given the unsettled nature of the law with respect to certain claims, a resolution of these issues by the Court would have constituted a significant risk for the class,” Caldwell wrote. “Undoubtedly, this relief is preferable to the possibility of a smaller recovery, or none at all, after an expensive and protracted trial and appeal are completed.”
. . . . .
Mike Banas, spokesman for Indiana-based NiSource, which merged with Columbia Energy, and Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake, said the company does not comment on lawsuits. Messages left for John Famularo, the attorney for the plaintiffs, were not immediately returned.
The lawsuit, filed in 2007 in federal court in Pikeville, stems from claims by 8,185 eastern Kentucky landowners who leased natural gas rights to Chesapeake, NiSource and Columbia Energy. The landowners claimed the companies did not pay them royalties in the manner required by the leases and sent royalty reports that didn’t show that Chesapeake was deducting losses and expenses from the royalties.
The plaintiffs also contended the three companies conspired to sell the natural gas produced from the wells at a below-market value price, even though the leases required the gas be sold at fair market value.
The companies denied wrongdoing during the litigation and the settlement doesn’t require them to acknowledge fault.
Complete story here
Click anywhere on image to be taken to:
Tags: eminent domain, Pennsylvania, Spectra Energy, Steckman Ridge compressor station
Just what every property owner wants: exhibitionist nitwit trespassers freely accessing their properties via the pipeline easements you seized by eminent domain.
The star of this little film describes it thusly:
“just me riding a honda recon on the millenium pipeline stayed in 2ed gear because i couldent realy shift , i was holding the camra”
Tags: eminent domain, pipelines, trespass
Leasing Our Lives Away
So you’ve signed a gas lease. Congratulations: You’ve been taken for a fool. Certain material facts were kept from you that, had you known them, likely would have made you throw the contract in the trash where it belongs. Since you didn’t, let’s take a virtual tour of your new reality.
If a lot of your neighbors also signed, the gas company now has powers you were never told about. The lessee can essentially do whatever he wishes on the surface to produce the gas under your property. He can hold your property hostage for decades by performing inexpensive, nonproductive tasks. He can, and from all historical evidence will, pollute any surface location where he installs mineral extraction equipment. He does not care what you think about it.

Perhaps more ominous is the fact that he is not limited to extraction of minerals from a specific formation (such as the Barnett Shale) but may explore for deeper deposits that are said to exist under the Barnett Shale. In South Texas his brethren are still holding leases executed in the 1930s, leases that have so polluted the surface as to make the land unusable for its earlier purpose of cattle ranching. With the original target minerals now played out, these lessees today are exploring for and producing gas there. Equipment that is no longer functional still leaks carcinogens into the ground. The surface rights owners have been denied access to areas on their property. So, while you’ve been told verbally that there’ll be no effects on your surface usage, that is not an enforceable contract provision, and the lessee, and his landman representative, knew it when he or she asked you to sign.
And probably no one told you that, to produce the gas, there will have to be a drilling pad with multiple wells on it and peripheral equipment that will require large-truck service daily throughout the life of the wells and that the company is allowed to build this pad less than 300 feet from homes. They didn’t tell you that each drilling pad will require a 16-inch gathering line to carry away the gas to a processing facility or that right-of-way for this line can be taken by eminent domain if necessary or that the line will lie as close as 20 feet from home foundations without regard to the possible presence of enclosed spaces under the homes that can cause accumulation of unodorized gas and subsequent explosions in the event of a leak.
They didn’t tell you that what’s in the gathering lines is the most corrosive form of natural gas, which in some cases has eaten through pipeline walls in less than four years, with catastrophic results. They didn’t say that their plan to install these pipelines by horizontal drilling through front yards at a depth of about 20 feet would not protect you from an explosion due to corrosion and leaks. In fact, burying the pipeline makes inspection possible only with instruments too expensive to be affordable by secondary operators who will be buying out the original drillers within five years of installation. And because these instruments do not detect all corrosion, incidents like the Appomattox pipeline explosion of 2008 that leveled two homes and damaged 100 more and created a fireball 1,125 feet in diameter but, mercifully, injured only five people.
Your lessee also didn’t tell you that between 2004 and 2007 there were nine “significant incidents” reported in the Barnett Shale, which by federal criteria means anything that causes fire, explosion, human injury or death, $50,000 or more in damage, or mass evacuation. Statistically, those numbers imply that when industry and the City of Fort Worth have enabled a full build-out of the gas field here, there should be roughly one such incident every six months in Fort Worth.
The city has acted as a co-conspirator by approving the industry’s activities and helping create a bandwagon atmosphere that blinds mineral rights owners with dollar signs. City officials continue to defend the drilling industry’s activities here and have entered into questionable leases of our parkland. They ignored a provision of the existing zoning ordinance that would limit such installations to heavy-industry zones and have passed a new zoning ordinance that permits gas drilling and gas gathering processing and pipelines in every zoning category. They have knowingly denied the dangers both of the pollution and the “significant incidents” that are sure to come.
Elected officials have also ignored public safety and public health concerns, the backbone of the state zoning code, in favor of asserting the primacy of mineral rights over all other rights. Their 600-foot setback provision, touted as a safety measure, is not based on any scientific or engineering data. Last month the council showed the ultimate contempt for that phony provision by permitting Chesapeake Energy to create a multi-well drilling pad within 600 feet of 48 “protected use” properties – even though Chesapeake was able to secure waivers from owners of only nine of those properties.
You can see where this is all leading.
When Fort Worth has its next significant gas well or pipeline accident, there will be hand-wringing at city hall and attempts to manage the public reaction. “Whoops! This is just an act of God, an unfortunate rare occurrence that nobody could have foreseen!”
Next, the fire marshal will be asked why he didn’t tell the council about the dangers of placing these pipelines so close to houses with pier-and-beam foundations. The New London School explosion of 1937 will be mentioned.
After that will come the insurance industry, with eyes bugged out. “This was forecast. Now it has happened, and the math says it is likely to happen here with a regularity that we cannot afford. Therefore, Fort Worth homeowners will have to buy an extra rider on their mortgage insurance, and the cost will be …” you don’t want to know. Many people will no longer be able to afford to live in their homes.
Next, the value of homes will fall, since national publicity of our woes will make homes tough to sell. That will cause taxing authorities to raise tax rates. After that, Wall Street will also get the bug-eye and degrade bonds in Tarrant County.
This is what almost certainly will happen here if the gas drillers have their way.
And what will you get? Maybe the lease offer on your quarter-acre lot included a bonus of $25,000 per acre plus 25 percent royalties. If gas prices stay high that might get you about $208 per year in royalties, or about $12,450 total (including your bonus) over a 30-year payout lifetime.
Oh, and remember, that’s the gross amount. It doesn’t consider income tax and an ad valorem property tax increase due to all that gas you own. Of course, gas prices are in the toilet right now, and they’re selling less gas than they’d expected.
Do you still think the Barnett Shale is a personal bonanza? Do you think your mineral lease omits enough material facts to render it fraudulent? In that case, your lease is probably fraudulent
and unenforceable.
Good luck with that.
Jerry Lobdill is a retired physicist, a longtime environmental activist, a writer, and the owner of a home with mineral rights in Fort Worth. What he’s not is a lawyer, and nothing in this article should be construed as legal advice.
- reprinted in full from Fort Worth Weekly with author’s permission







0